Avançar para o conteúdo principal

Fundraising Named One of Top 30 Careers in 2009


Fundraising is ranked among the best careers this year by U.S. News and World Report, receiving a grade of “A” in all categories including prestige and job market outlook.

The report, which was issued electronically in January and recently published in the magazine's print edition, also gave fundraising an “A” in job satisfaction and training difficulty.

Other jobs that made the top 30 include audiologist, firefighter, higher education administrator, mediator, urban regional planner and veterinarian.

In its secton about fundraising, the magazine writes:

Whether it's for a political party or the Little League, many people like the idea of being a fundraiser, except for one thing: "I could never ask for money." Fact is, only a small percentage of a development (fundraising) professional's time is spent on 'the ask.'

In fact, the task is often easy if you've built a relationship with the donor and made the donor's involvement in the organization pleasant. Most of a development professional's time is spent recruiting, training, and motivating volunteers, developing a database of donors, conducting research on wealthy prospects to maximize the size of their donations, friendraising, writing grant proposals, overseeing E-mail and phone campaigns, and/or running fundraising events, like a splashy gala. The best development professionals naturally inspire trust. They're intelligent but low key and comfortable being self-effacing: That makes donors feel as though they're a cut above. Low-pressure, polished sales managers do well as fundraisers and fundraising managers.

Comentários

Anónimo disse…
I challenge Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie to spend the obscene reserves held by their 'Jolie-Pitt' Foundation on legitimate efficient 'humanitarian' work or turn the funds over to others who will. To date, they have taken in $22,000,000 on the sale of baby photos alone, another 6 or 7 figures from other sources, and spent or granted only a fraction of that on 'humanitarian' work or 'good will' of any kind. The rest so far, has been spent on PR campaigns, plane rides, and super-high end accomodations for Brad and Angie in exotic locations around the world. I challenge them to meet the criteria of a legitimate charity, operate with a reasonable overhead, open their books to prove it, and get their 'foundation' worthy of a decent rating by an independent watchdog like Charitywatch.org. Otherwise, to stop selling baby photos for their own 'charity' and stop seeking publicity for donations made in their own name to their own foundation/travel/PR firm shortly before or after the premier of their latest film or DVD release. I challenge Brad Pitt to do the same with his 'Make it right' Foundation. Which to date, has not met the criteria of a legitimate charity or been given a decent rating by ANY independent charity watchdog. Otherwise, to stop competing with 'Habitat for Humanity' for PR, credit, and funding. Who by the way have been building homes for the less fortunate in every major city including New Orleans for decades. 'Habitat for Humanity' has been 'Top Rated' for years by charitywatch.org and others. They operate with a low overhead, volunteer workforce, and donated materials. No similar effort can match their progress hour for hour or dollar for dollar. They don't even come close. Unlike 'Make it right', the homes built by 'Habitat' don't sit vacant. They don't exclude by cost, lower income families. They are allocated and built specifically for the less fortunate who take part in the building process and move in immediately upon completion. 'Habitat' works in every major city including New Orleans. It puts 'Make it right' to shame. In fact, hundreds of legitimate charities have been given good-excellent ratings by Charitywatch.org and other independent watchdog groups. By contrast, the vast, overwhelming majority of celebrity 'foundations' have been rated poorly, fair, or not rated at all. They are inefficient, corrupt, focus heavily on PR, and operate with shady, self-serving, misleading accounting practices. They usually don't even meet the criteria of a legitimate charity. Still, they have the nerve to self-audit, self-praise, mislead the donor/fan base, seek funding from a number of sources including ordinary people, compete with legitimate charities, and cash in on maximum PR for their inefficient 'humanitarian' efforts. Its not right.

Mensagens populares deste blogue

Las siete reglas de oro de la captación de fondos

Independientemente de si eres nuevo o ya conoces bien la profesión de la captación de fondos, de si captas fondos a través de la web o del modo tradicional (o ambos), te presentamos a continuación una serie de conocimientos y técnicas básicas que te serán útiles en tu trabajo. Si logras dominarlas, aumentarás las posibilidades de captar más dinero y de disfrutar de tu trabajo. Mucha gente simplemente se lanza a esta profesión sin haber aprendido previamente cuáles son los fundamentos de esta industria. No se aprenden de la noche a la mañana y puede que alguno de los consejos siguientes sean más fáciles de llevar a cabo que otros. Puede que necesites recurrir a ayuda externa, consultar a expertos o asistir a clases para que llegues a dominar aquello que necesites saber. Si necesitas ayuda, no dudes en pedirla. Te facilitará el trabajo. A continuación te exponemos algunas reglas de oro: 1. Estudia los argumentos que pueden ser útiles a tu organización a la hora de conseguir apoyo y la me...

MOVIMENTO ANTI-POPOTA, LEOPOLDINA E ARREDONDAMENTOS!!!

É extraordinário como é fácil fazer grande caridade com o dinheiro dos outros!!! Pedem-nos "apenas" dois euros e fazem-nos o favor de doar um para a caridade. Claro que quem aparece a doar no final vários milhares são os donos dos grandes armazéns ... com o nosso dinheiro!! Reparem no que diz o site de um desses supermercados: "Nestes últimos três anos conseguimos angariar (...) um montante superior a um milhão de euros, " .... Extraordinário realmente, sobretudo se pensarmos que esse milhão de euros foi automaticamente deduzido dos impostos desta empresa .... como se fosse dinheiro deles e não nosso. Se querem dar para caridade dêm directamente ... ou se eu vos pedir vocês dão-me a mim para eu poder doar?! Então porque dão aos Modelos, Continentes, e Wortens? Eles têm obrigação e responsabilidade social a cumprir! Exijam! Se concordarem comigo enviem para outras pessoas.   (PS. Esta mensagem não é minha mas subscrevo o seu conteúdo)

Popota

«...para que a população sénior tenha uma melhor qualidade de vida» Este Natal, a Causa Maior e a Popota estão de volta. E para que possa contribuir mais uma vez para esta causa, os hipermercados Modelo colocaram à venda o CD Popota – A Estrela Deste Natal com um dueto inédito entre a Popota e o Tony Carreira. O CD está disponível nas lojas Modelo e Continente e tem o custo de 3€, sendo que 1€ reverte para Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa. A “Causa Maior” é uma iniciativa de responsabilidade social do Modelo , que visa proporcionar uma melhor qualidade de vida à Comunidade Sénior, através da acção social desenvolvida pela Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa , através da sua rede de Delegações locais. Em 2007 o projecto CAUSA MAIOR angariou a nível nacional, um valor total de 330 mil euros, que foi distribuído pelas mais de 90 localidades onde o MODELO está presente. No total o apoio chegou a perto de 80 mil seniores através de cirurgias, acções de formação; rastreios; ajudas técnicas e também com ...